Should we stop storing links in the page content? #9

New Issue

reivilibre · 2022-03-29T18:23:13Z

reivilibre commented

2022-03-29 18:23:13 +00:00

The references part should potentially be enough.

I suppose it doesn't really matter as much since it won't make it to the index; we can filter this out later?

The references part should potentially be enough. I suppose it doesn't really matter as much since it won't make it to the index; we can filter this out later?

reivilibre added the

question

label 2022-03-29 18:23:13 +00:00

reivilibre commented

2022-04-03 09:44:34 +00:00

Example with links: 29428 bytes

Same example without links: 20857 bytes

That's a significant saving that I think it is worthwhile keeping.

Example with links: 29428 bytes Same example without links: 20857 bytes That's a significant saving that I think it is worthwhile keeping.

reivilibre referenced this issue from a commit

2022-04-03 09:47:37 +00:00

Dissolve links before emitting documents to the pack store

reivilibre closed this issue

2022-04-03 09:47:37 +00:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Label

No Milestone

No project

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: reivilibre/quickpeep#9