Internal change
PiperOrigin-RevId: 347949207 Change-Id: Ie68a95170cdc2bbe2a1ff72ef05e019ec39521a8
This commit is contained in:
parent
173dd7b6d5
commit
f471e856ec
@ -881,24 +881,7 @@ class CopyRemover {
|
||||
return ordering_.IsDefinedBefore(*a.value, *b.value);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return absl::c_all_of(a.uses, [&](const HloUse* use) {
|
||||
// Here if the HloUse is located in a branch that is exclusive to b's
|
||||
// branch, it can be skipped, because in order for them to interfere,
|
||||
// there must be an execution path from b's definition to the HloUse. If
|
||||
// there is such a path, it would have to pass through the point where the
|
||||
// two exclusive branches are joined. The join point would have to contain
|
||||
// a phi operation because b's definition is not guranteed to reach a. The
|
||||
// phi operation would be another use of a that would ensure correct
|
||||
// answer is returned.
|
||||
switch (ordering_.GetExecutionConstraint(
|
||||
use->instruction, b.value->defining_instruction())) {
|
||||
case HloOrdering::ExecutionConstraint::kIsSame:
|
||||
case HloOrdering::ExecutionConstraint::kRunExclusiveAfter:
|
||||
case HloOrdering::ExecutionConstraint::kRunExclusiveBefore:
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return ordering_.UseIsBeforeValueDefinition(*use, *b.value,
|
||||
dataflow_);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return ordering_.UseIsBeforeValueDefinition(*use, *b.value, dataflow_);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2473,52 +2473,6 @@ ENTRY TestComputation {
|
||||
op::While(op::Copy(op::Parameter())));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(CopyInsertionTest, NestedWhileAndConditional) {
|
||||
const string& hlo_string = R"(
|
||||
HloModule TestModule
|
||||
|
||||
on_true
|
||||
{
|
||||
v1 = f32[2] parameter(0)
|
||||
ROOT v2 = f32[2] add(v1,v1)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
on_false
|
||||
{
|
||||
v1 = f32[2] parameter(0)
|
||||
ROOT v2 = f32[2] multiply(v1,v1)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cond.outer {
|
||||
param.1 = (pred[], f32[2]) parameter(0)
|
||||
ROOT param.cond.outer = pred[] get-tuple-element(param.1), index=0
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
body.outer {
|
||||
param.1 = (pred[], f32[2]) parameter(0)
|
||||
pred.1 = pred[] get-tuple-element(param.1), index=0
|
||||
arg_tuple.11 = f32[2] get-tuple-element(param.1), index=1
|
||||
if = f32[2] conditional(pred.1, arg_tuple.11, arg_tuple.11), true_computation=on_true, false_computation=on_false
|
||||
ROOT res = (pred[], f32[2]) tuple(pred.1,if)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ENTRY TestComputation {
|
||||
entry_param.1 = pred[] parameter(0)
|
||||
float_param = f32[2] parameter(1)
|
||||
entry_param = (pred[], f32[2]) tuple(entry_param.1, float_param)
|
||||
ROOT while = (pred[], f32[2]) while(entry_param), condition=cond.outer, body=body.outer
|
||||
}
|
||||
)";
|
||||
TF_ASSERT_OK_AND_ASSIGN(std::unique_ptr<HloModule> module,
|
||||
ParseAndReturnVerifiedModule(hlo_string));
|
||||
InsertCopies(module.get());
|
||||
VLOG(2) << module->ToString() << "\n";
|
||||
|
||||
// There should only be a single copy inserted, and it's in the entry
|
||||
// computation.
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(CountCopies(*module), 2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(CopyInsertionTest, FixpointComputationRequired) {
|
||||
const string& hlo_string = R"(
|
||||
HloModule Module
|
||||
|
@ -34,21 +34,6 @@ namespace xla {
|
||||
|
||||
bool HloOrdering::ExecutesBefore(const HloInstruction* a,
|
||||
const HloInstruction* b) const {
|
||||
switch (GetExecutionConstraint(a, b)) {
|
||||
case ExecutionConstraint::kIsSame: // a and b are the same instruction;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
case ExecutionConstraint::kRunBefore:
|
||||
case ExecutionConstraint::kRunExclusiveBefore:
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
case ExecutionConstraint::kRunExclusiveAfter:
|
||||
case ExecutionConstraint::kRunAfter:
|
||||
case ExecutionConstraint::kUnordered:
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
HloOrdering::ExecutionConstraint HloOrdering::GetExecutionConstraint(
|
||||
const HloInstruction* a, const HloInstruction* b) const {
|
||||
// 'a' and 'b' may be in different computations. In this case, find the
|
||||
// callgraph ancestor instructions which call (potentially transitively) the
|
||||
// computations containing 'a' and 'b' and use these ancestor instructions to
|
||||
@ -62,7 +47,7 @@ HloOrdering::ExecutionConstraint HloOrdering::GetExecutionConstraint(
|
||||
if (a_ancestor == nullptr) {
|
||||
// Ancestors in a common computation could not be found so consider the
|
||||
// instructions 'a' and 'b' to be unordered.
|
||||
return ExecutionConstraint::kUnordered;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// a_ancestor and b_ancestor must be either both null or both non-null.
|
||||
CHECK_NE(b_ancestor, nullptr);
|
||||
@ -77,7 +62,7 @@ HloOrdering::ExecutionConstraint HloOrdering::GetExecutionConstraint(
|
||||
const HloComputation* condition = a_ancestor->while_condition();
|
||||
if (call_graph_->InstructionIsNestedIn(a, condition) &&
|
||||
call_graph_->InstructionIsNestedIn(b, body)) {
|
||||
return ExecutionConstraint::kRunBefore;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -100,40 +85,17 @@ HloOrdering::ExecutionConstraint HloOrdering::GetExecutionConstraint(
|
||||
b_branch = j;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// If neither a nor b is inside the branches they both are the ancestor.
|
||||
if (a_branch == -1 && b_branch == -1) {
|
||||
CHECK_EQ(a, a_ancestor);
|
||||
CHECK_EQ(b, b_ancestor);
|
||||
CHECK_EQ(a, b);
|
||||
return ExecutionConstraint::kIsSame;
|
||||
if (a_branch != -1 && a_branch < b_branch) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// If 'b' is the conditional ancestor, and 'a' is within a branch
|
||||
// computation, 'a' executes before 'b'.
|
||||
if (b_branch == -1) {
|
||||
CHECK_EQ(b, a_ancestor);
|
||||
return ExecutionConstraint::kRunBefore;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (a_branch == -1) {
|
||||
CHECK_EQ(a, a_ancestor);
|
||||
return ExecutionConstraint::kRunAfter;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (a_branch < b_branch) {
|
||||
return ExecutionConstraint::kRunExclusiveBefore;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (b_branch < a_branch) {
|
||||
return ExecutionConstraint::kRunExclusiveAfter;
|
||||
if (b == a_ancestor && a_branch != -1) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (ExecutesBeforeInSameComputation(a_ancestor, b_ancestor)) {
|
||||
return ExecutionConstraint::kRunBefore;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (ExecutesBeforeInSameComputation(b_ancestor, a_ancestor)) {
|
||||
return ExecutionConstraint::kRunAfter;
|
||||
}
|
||||
VLOG(1) << "Cannot determine order between:" << a_ancestor->ToString() << "\n"
|
||||
<< "and " << b_ancestor->ToString() << "\n";
|
||||
return ExecutionConstraint::kUnordered;
|
||||
return ExecutesBeforeInSameComputation(a_ancestor, b_ancestor);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool HloOrdering::IsDefinedBefore(const HloValue& a, const HloValue& b) const {
|
||||
@ -337,25 +299,10 @@ bool HloOrdering::LiveRangeStrictlyBefore(
|
||||
use.instruction)) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Here if the HloUse is located in a branch that is exclusive to b's
|
||||
// branch, it can be skipped, because in order for them to interfere, there
|
||||
// must be an execution path from b's definition to the HloUse. If there is
|
||||
// such a path, it would have to pass through the point where the two
|
||||
// exclusive branches are joined. The join point would have to contain a
|
||||
// phi operation because b's definition is not guranteed to reach a. The
|
||||
// phi operation would be another use of a that would ensure correct answer
|
||||
// is returned.
|
||||
switch (GetExecutionConstraint(use.instruction, b.defining_instruction())) {
|
||||
case HloOrdering::ExecutionConstraint::kIsSame:
|
||||
case HloOrdering::ExecutionConstraint::kRunExclusiveAfter:
|
||||
case HloOrdering::ExecutionConstraint::kRunExclusiveBefore:
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
if (!UseIsBeforeValueDefinition(use, b, dataflow)) {
|
||||
VLOG(4) << "use of " << a << " (" << use << ") not before " << b
|
||||
<< " is defined";
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!UseIsBeforeValueDefinition(use, b, dataflow)) {
|
||||
VLOG(4) << "use of " << a << " (" << use << ") not before " << b
|
||||
<< " is defined";
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -37,30 +37,10 @@ namespace xla {
|
||||
// determine live range overlap of HLO instruction output buffers.
|
||||
class HloOrdering {
|
||||
public:
|
||||
explicit HloOrdering(const HloModule* module)
|
||||
HloOrdering(const HloModule* module)
|
||||
: module_(module), call_graph_(CallGraph::Build(module)) {}
|
||||
virtual ~HloOrdering() = default;
|
||||
|
||||
// Specify the ordering constraints between a pair of instructions a and b.
|
||||
enum class ExecutionConstraint {
|
||||
// Indicate a and b are the same instruction;
|
||||
kIsSame,
|
||||
// Indicate a runs before b;
|
||||
kRunBefore,
|
||||
// Only one of a or b runs each time their common ancestor is evaluated,
|
||||
// and a is in an earlier branch than b.
|
||||
kRunExclusiveBefore,
|
||||
// Only one of a or b runs each time, and a is in a later branch than b.
|
||||
kRunExclusiveAfter,
|
||||
// Indicate a runs after b
|
||||
kRunAfter,
|
||||
// An order cannot be detrermined as a and b do not have a common ancestor.
|
||||
kUnordered,
|
||||
};
|
||||
// Return the execution constraint between a and b.
|
||||
HloOrdering::ExecutionConstraint GetExecutionConstraint(
|
||||
const HloInstruction* a, const HloInstruction* b) const;
|
||||
|
||||
// Returns true if instruction 'a' executes before instruction 'b'. This is
|
||||
// not reflexive, that is, an instruction does not execute before itself.
|
||||
bool ExecutesBefore(const HloInstruction* a, const HloInstruction* b) const;
|
||||
@ -201,8 +181,8 @@ class DependencyHloOrdering : public PredecessorHloOrdering {
|
||||
// interference is reduced relative to DependencyHloOrdering.
|
||||
class SequentialHloOrdering : public HloOrdering {
|
||||
public:
|
||||
explicit SequentialHloOrdering(const HloSchedule& schedule);
|
||||
explicit SequentialHloOrdering(HloSchedule&& schedule);
|
||||
SequentialHloOrdering(const HloSchedule& schedule);
|
||||
SequentialHloOrdering(HloSchedule&& schedule);
|
||||
~SequentialHloOrdering() override = default;
|
||||
|
||||
// Returns the sequential instruction order for the given computation.
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user